2211.00916
Hyperbolic and Bi-Hyperbolic Solutions in the Planar Restricted (N+1)-Body Problem
Guowei Yu
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper explicitly proves both halves of the claim. Theorem 1.1 constructs, for any initial point/time, hyperbolic half-orbits with prescribed asymptotic direction and speed √(2h); see the statement and proof outline including the blow-up argument to handle arbitrary period T (Theorem 1.1 and its proof) . More importantly, Theorem 1.2 proves that for every pair (θ−, θ+) and every h>0 there exists a bi-hyperbolic solution with those prescribed asymptotics, with at most one collision; this is achieved by a variational construction using a “tied” topological constraint and free-time minimizers (Definitions/Propositions in Section 4), culminating in the stated theorem and its proof . The candidate’s assertion that the bi-hyperbolic result is likely open as of 2022-11-02 is therefore incorrect.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript settles a natural and challenging scattering existence problem in the time-periodic restricted (N+1)-body setting using variational methods with a topological constraint, avoiding delicate transversality arguments. The structure is sound, the argument is carefully executed, and the results appear correct and impactful. Minor clarifications would further aid readability, especially around the constrained classes and the asymptotic estimates.