Back to search
2211.02996

Accurate control to run and stop chemical reactions via relaxation oscillators

Xiaopeng Shi, Chuanhou Gao, Denis Dochain

incompletemedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proposes concrete ODE/CRN constructions and claims period control, successive period halving, multi-module gating, and a counter that stops the system after n loops, but most claims are only argued heuristically or via simulation; key steps (e.g., uniqueness/stability of the limit cycle, rigorous complementarity and phase ordering, and the m-module Proposition 2) are left without proofs and even include a parameter-typing slip (text says “double η2” while equations double η1) . The candidate model supplies a substantially more rigorous geometric singular perturbation and contraction-based framework that supports most design claims, but it incorrectly asserts exact finite-time termination (x becoming identically zero) under the logistic gate; with x' = −κ(t) x^2 on the last cycle (when n − y = 0), solutions approach 0 asymptotically, not in finite time. Hence, both the paper and the model fall short of complete, fully correct proofs.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The design is clear, modular, and practically relevant for CRN-based control. However, essential theoretical claims (existence/uniqueness/hyperbolicity, quantified complementarity, and multi-module nesting) are not proved, and the termination story is simulation-based. A small parameter slip (text vs equations) should be corrected. With rigorous analysis and clearer termination guarantees, the contribution would be significantly strengthened.