2211.10468
Stability on Quinquevigintic Functional Equation in Different Spaces
Ramdoss Murali, Sandra Pinelas, Veeramani Vithya
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines H via the 25th forward difference and proves a generalized Hyers–Ulam stability theorem in matrix normed spaces using a fixed-point operator Jf(x)=2^{-25q}f(2^q x) and a control σ that scales by 2^{25q} (Theorem 3.1). It also shows that any exact solution satisfies ζ(2u)=2^{25}ζ(u) by combining shifted instances of (1) (eqs. (2)–(14)). The candidate solution mirrors this logic: it recognizes H as a 25th finite difference, derives the same weighted identity that expresses f(2x)−2^{25}f(x) as a linear combination of H_f at specific arguments, defines the same contraction J, and applies the Diaz–Margolis fixed point alternative to obtain a unique limit V with H_V≡0 and the expected error bound. The main difference is stylistic: the model justifies the weights via an operator identity involving T (shift), while the paper derives them by explicit elimination. Both yield the same contraction scheme and estimates. Minor issues in the paper include typographical slips (e.g., “223q” clearly meaning 2^{25q}) and that the section titled “general solution” only proves the 2^{25}-homogeneity property rather than a full structural characterization, but these do not affect the core stability result the model addresses. Citations: definition of H and σ∗ in Theorem 3.1 and its bound (17) ; fixed-point consequences in the proof of Theorem 3.1 (21) and H_V≡0 ; derivation of ζ(2u)=2^{25}ζ(u) from (2)–(14) ; and the constants appearing in σ∗/corollaries .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper faithfully sets up a 25th-order finite-difference functional equation and proves generalized Hyers–Ulam stability in matrix normed and matrix non-Archimedean fuzzy normed spaces via a standard fixed-point framework. The methodology is sound and consistent with prior literature. Minor typographical issues (notably the notation for 2\^25) and an overstatement in the section titled “general solution” should be corrected or clarified. With these light edits, the contribution is technically correct and of interest to specialists in the area.