2211.11459
Dynamics analysis of the fractional-order Lagrange system
Mihai Ivan
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Propositions 3.1–3.3 compute the Jacobians at e0, e1^m, e2^m, e3^m for the controlled Caputo system (3.3), use Matignon’s criterion |arg(λ)| > qπ/2, and, since all spectra are real, reduce stability to strict negativity of all eigenvalues; this yields exactly: (i) e0 stable iff c1<0 and c2<0; (ii) e1^m stable iff c1<0, c2<0, and |m|<−c2; (iii) e2^m and e3^m stable iff c1<0, c2<0, and |m|<√(c1 c2), with instability otherwise. These match the candidate solution’s conditions and method step-by-step. Minor issues in the paper include a sign typo in the proof of Proposition 3.2, but the stated results are correct. See Proposition 3.1 (e0) , Proposition 3.2 (e1^m) , and Proposition 3.3 (e2^m, e3^m) ; the Jacobians and characteristic polynomials used are as in the paper’s Section 3 , .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper correctly derives explicit local stability conditions for the controlled fractional Lagrange system using Matignon’s criterion. The proofs are straightforward eigenvalue inspections of Jacobians with clear parameter conditions. A small sign typo in the proof of Proposition 3.2 should be corrected, and the linearization-based “iff” could be qualified with standard assumptions. Numerical evidence is consistent. Overall, it is a solid, application-oriented contribution.