2212.01147
The generalized IFS Bayesian method and an associated variational principle covering the classical and dynamical cases
Artur O. Lopes, Jairo. K. Mengue
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 30 shows that, under the stated boundedness and positivity assumptions (bounded π_a, and l, ψ bounded and bounded away from zero), the variational problem sup over holonomic π̃ of ∫[log l + log π_a − log ϕ] dπ̃ + H_{dθ}(π̃) has value 0 attained by any posterior π; the argument proceeds via (i) the entropy identity H_ν(π) = −∫ log l̄ dπ and the change of base to H_{dθ}, (ii) the decomposition l̄ = (l ψ∘τ)/(ψ ϕ), and (iii) the holonomy identity with g = log ψ, which cancels ψ-terms and yields the announced value and maximizers (see (17), (18), (31) and the discussion leading to (32) and Theorem 30) . The candidate solution repeats these same steps: explicit change-of-base for entropy, bounding H_ν by −∫ log l̄, using log l − log ϕ − log l̄ = log ψ − log ψ∘τ, and constructing maximizers from stationary ρ, concluding J(π̃) ≤ 0 for all holonomic π̃ and J(π) = 0 for posteriors. Assumptions match those in the paper and ensure boundedness of the logarithms so holonomy applies; minor integrability technicalities around log π_a are handled implicitly in both treatments. Overall, both are correct and essentially the same proof .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The theorem and variational argument are correct and nicely tie the IFS Bayesian construction to a pressure/entropy maximization principle. The proof is concise and mirrors known techniques from Thermodynamic Formalism adapted to holonomic measures. Minor improvements in measure-theoretic clarity (explicit domain for the entropy base-change and finiteness conditions) would make the exposition crisper. The contribution is valuable for specialists by unifying viewpoints rather than introducing fundamentally new techniques.