Back to search
2212.01147

The generalized IFS Bayesian method and an associated variational principle covering the classical and dynamical cases

Artur O. Lopes, Jairo. K. Mengue

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 30 shows that, under the stated boundedness and positivity assumptions (bounded π_a, and l, ψ bounded and bounded away from zero), the variational problem sup over holonomic π̃ of ∫[log l + log π_a − log ϕ] dπ̃ + H_{dθ}(π̃) has value 0 attained by any posterior π; the argument proceeds via (i) the entropy identity H_ν(π) = −∫ log l̄ dπ and the change of base to H_{dθ}, (ii) the decomposition l̄ = (l ψ∘τ)/(ψ ϕ), and (iii) the holonomy identity with g = log ψ, which cancels ψ-terms and yields the announced value and maximizers (see (17), (18), (31) and the discussion leading to (32) and Theorem 30) . The candidate solution repeats these same steps: explicit change-of-base for entropy, bounding H_ν by −∫ log l̄, using log l − log ϕ − log l̄ = log ψ − log ψ∘τ, and constructing maximizers from stationary ρ, concluding J(π̃) ≤ 0 for all holonomic π̃ and J(π) = 0 for posteriors. Assumptions match those in the paper and ensure boundedness of the logarithms so holonomy applies; minor integrability technicalities around log π_a are handled implicitly in both treatments. Overall, both are correct and essentially the same proof .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The theorem and variational argument are correct and nicely tie the IFS Bayesian construction to a pressure/entropy maximization principle. The proof is concise and mirrors known techniques from Thermodynamic Formalism adapted to holonomic measures. Minor improvements in measure-theoretic clarity (explicit domain for the entropy base-change and finiteness conditions) would make the exposition crisper. The contribution is valuable for specialists by unifying viewpoints rather than introducing fundamentally new techniques.