2212.03857
Phase2vec: Dynamical systems embedding with a physics-informed convolutional network
Matthew Ricci, Noa Moriel, Zoe Piran, Mor Nitzan
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines the fixed‑point–normalized loss L1(Ẋ, Ẋrecon) = ||Ẋ − Ẋrecon||^2 / (||Ẋ||^2 + ε) and explicitly motivates that it is especially large where Ẋ vanishes, thereby emphasizing fixed points and slow regions; the candidate formalizes this with a simple and correct inequality argument that quantifies the weighting effect over regions with ||Ẋ|| ≤ δ and shows dominance as δ→0 . The paper uses a cubic monomial dictionary with 10 basis terms for 2D vector fields and studies “Conservativity,” “Incompressibility,” and “Linear stability” classification tasks; the candidate derives the corresponding coefficient‑space linear constraints (curl=0 and div=0) and the trace–determinant–discriminant characterization for linear systems. These derivations are mathematically correct and consistent with the paper’s setup, which generates/labels these classes (Appendix A.3) but does not spell out the linear constraints in coefficient space . In short: the paper’s claims are correct and empirically supported, while the model provides rigorous proofs for the specific subclaims posed in the solver question.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript presents a clear and useful embedding approach for 2D dynamical systems with a physics-informed loss emphasizing fixed points. It convincingly demonstrates reconstruction and decoding of physical properties. The analysis is correct at the level presented; adding compact mathematical remarks on why normalization emphasizes fixed points and explicit coefficient-space constraints for conservative/incompressible classes would strengthen clarity and reproducibility. Minor notational ambiguities in the incompressibility construction should be clarified.