Back to search
2212.04847

On the correspondence between symmetries of two-dimensional autonomous dynamical systems and their phase plane realisations

Fredrik Ohlsson, Johannes G. Borgqvist, Ruth E. Baker

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The candidate’s steps (A–D) reproduce the paper’s three theorems and the lifting-PDE solution essentially verbatim. Step A matches Theorem 1 by computing Df, showing f∗(X(1)) = (f∗X)^{(1)}, with the ∂_{v′}-coefficient Duηv − v′Duηu agreeing with Eqs. (3.5)–(3.7) in the paper . Step B matches Theorem 2, deriving that f∗X is a symmetry of v′ = Ω via the determining equations and the quotient rule, consistent with Eq. (3.10) . Step C states the lifting condition Dtξ = (1/ωu)[(ωu∂u + ωv∂v)ζu − (ζu∂u + ζv∂v)ωu] and its equivalence with the ωv-form when ωv ≠ 0, as in Theorem 3 (Eqs. (4.2), (4.4)–(4.8)) . Step D solves the linear transport PDE ∂tξ + ωu∂uξ + ωv∂vξ = G(u,v) along characteristics, yielding ξ = ∫G ds + F with F constant on characteristics, exactly as Eqs. (4.9)–(4.12) . Minor omissions (e.g., the special ωv = 0 case treated explicitly in the paper) do not affect correctness.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The work provides a rigorous and practically useful link between time-domain and phase-plane symmetries for two-state autonomous systems. The results are correct and well-motivated, with clear theorems and illuminating examples. Minor improvements regarding explicit domain restrictions and the handling of degenerate cases would enhance clarity.