Back to search
2402.02496

TUBULAR DIMENSION: LEAF-WISE ASYMPTOTIC LOCAL PRODUCT STRUCTURE, AND ENTROPY AND VOLUME GROWTH

Snir Ben Ovadia

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines tubes and tubular dimension (Definitions 4.1 and 4.5) and proves Theorem 4.6: for μ-a.e. x, ρ^T_{i+1}(x)=Δ·(h_{i+1}−h_i)/χ_{i+1}+β_{i+1}χ_i d_i, using the intermediate-entropy formula for pucks (Theorem 3.3), the inclusion of pre-tubes into tubes (Proposition 4.4), and tubular covering/differentiation (Lemma 4.2) . The candidate solution independently obtains the same exponent by disintegrating μ along ξ_i inside ξ_{i+1}, combining the exact-dimensionality of leafwise conditionals and the transverse quotient (Ledrappier–Young), and leveraging Pesin–Lipschitz charts; this yields the same decay rate Δ·(h_{i+1}−h_i)/χ_{i+1}+β_{i+1}χ_i d_i. The paper’s proof avoids a direct product-disintegration estimate in favor of a covering/differentiation argument via pucks, but both are logically consistent and reach the same result. Ledrappier–Young’s relations di+1−di=(h_{i+1}−h_i)/χ_{i+1} underlie both approaches .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript proposes a geometric device (tubes) to interpolate between Bowen-type objects and leafwise balls, and rigorously computes its measure. The method is robust to non-conformality and yields meaningful applications to asymptotic local product structure and entropy gaps. The argument is coherent and grounded in standard Pesin–Ledrappier–Young theory. Minor exposition improvements would further aid readability.