Back to search
2402.05684

Optimum dimensional synthesis of planar mechanisms with geometric constraints

V. García-Marina, I. Fernández de Bustos, G. Urkullu, R. Ansola

incompletemedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper correctly defines both Euclidean and squared-distance constraints, provides exact gradients/Hessians, highlights the d=0 singularity for the Euclidean form, and presents the KKT/SQP block system. It does not formalize the equivalence of KKT multipliers under constraint rescaling nor discuss constraint qualification at D=0. The model’s solution correctly proves feasible-set equivalence for D>0 and the KKT multiplier scaling at feasibility, and it flags the D=0 degeneracy; however, it overstates the equivalence of the SQP Newton systems by omitting the additional gradient–gradient term that appears in the Lagrangian Hessian for the squared formulation. Hence both are largely correct but each misses key technical nuances.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper is a solid, practitioner-oriented contribution that carefully derives and implements two alternative geometric equality constraints within an SQP framework, with convincing examples. To strengthen it further, the authors should add a brief theoretical discussion on KKT equivalence under constraint rescaling (for D>0) and acknowledge constraint-qualification issues for the D=0 case, clarifying how their pragmatic fixes interact with optimality conditions.