2402.05751
Limit theorems for a strongly irreducible product of independent random matrices under optimal moment assumptions
Axel Péneau
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s pivotal-extraction framework rigorously delivers the required block-structure, high-probability alignment, exponential tails, and conditional moment domination via an explicit pivot/acceptance mechanism and Markov-bundle extraction (see Theorem 1.1 and its construction via Theorem 4.9 and Lemmas 4.13–4.22 ). By contrast, the model’s Step 3 crucially asserts the existence of fixed left/right compact sets L_j^⋄, R_i^⋄ so that for every core c in a compact C of strongly contracting blocks, the top singular directions of every product ℓ c r land in prescribed small projective neighborhoods indexed by (j,i). This uniform steering of top singular directions across all c by a finite family of right/left factors independent of c is not justified and, in general, contradicts the stability behavior of singular directions under multiplication by a strongly contracting middle block. The paper avoids this pitfall by using a data-dependent acceptance/pivot scheme that guarantees Schottky alignment and conditional control without requiring such uniform directional nets, and it also provides the two-sided/middle alignment mechanisms (Lemma 5.4 and the pivotal concatenation used in Theorem 5.13) with exponential tail controls .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper presents a coherent and technically solid development of a pivotal extraction method for products of random matrices under strong irreducibility and proximality. It establishes large deviations for singular/spectral gaps and convergence of dominant directions with a carefully engineered selection scheme (Markov-bundle extraction, acceptance function, and pivot algorithm). The arguments are internally consistent, modular, and align with contemporary approaches to Schottky/ping-pong methods. I find no gaps requiring changes; some expository pointers could further streamline the flow between the extraction (Section 4) and its probabilistic consequences (Section 5).