2402.09218
THE MUMFORD DYNAMICAL SYSTEM AND HYPERELLIPTIC KLEINIAN FUNCTIONS
Victor Buchstaber
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves, via coefficient/limit manipulations of the Mumford Lax system and the conserved polynomial H_ξ = v_ξ^2 + u_ξ w_ξ, that v_ξ = -(1/2)∂_1 u_ξ and w_ξ = (ξ + h_1 - 2u_1)u_ξ - (1/2)∂_1^2 u_ξ, derives u_k' = ∂_k u_1, defines the (P,Q)-recursion, and establishes the key results ∂_k u_1 = ∂_1 P_k (k=2,…,g) and the stationary ODE P_g'' = 2(h_1-2u_1)P_g + 2∑_{i+j=g+1}P_i Q_j + (1/2)∑_{i+j=g} P_i'' P_j'' - 2 h_{g+1} under Pg+1=0. The candidate solution reproduces the same chain of ideas: conservation of H_ξ, extraction of η^g and ξ^g coefficients to obtain the two basic identities and the mixed-flow identity, identification of a triangular system with the (P,Q)-recursion, and use of Pg+1=0 to obtain the ODE. Differences are stylistic (coefficient-extraction vs. ξ→∞ limit), not substantive. The arguments agree step-for-step with the paper’s Theorems 4.1, 4.4, 5.1, and 5.5.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript correctly develops a differential–algebraic approach to the Mumford system, defines the (P,Q)-recursion, and links it to stationary KdV-type equations. The results are sound and significant for integrable systems, offering a clear bridge between Lax-type hyperelliptic systems and differential recursions. Minor clarifications in derivations (especially around coefficient extraction and algebraic rearrangements) would enhance readability and accessibility.