Back to search
2402.09616

On O(p)×O(q)-invariant constant mean curvature hypersurfaces with singularity

Hilário Alencar, Ronaldo Garcia, Gregório Silva Neto

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves Hsiang’s conjecture using a cylindrical blow-up and invariant manifold analysis of a 3D vector field derived from the O(p)×O(q)-invariant CMC system, yielding uniqueness of the global type-E solution, its tangent α0 with tan α0=√((p−1)/(q−1)), and the origin curvatures ±2H(p+q−1)/(3p+3q−4), as well as the minimal cone case H=0 with stated principal curvatures. These statements and constants agree with the model’s conclusions. The model presents a different, weighted-curvature/Frobenius approach that reproduces the same leading-order asymptotics and uniqueness of the cusp germ, and gives the same curvature constants and minimal-cone data. However, the model’s local expansion omits the r^2 term (which the paper computes and is generally nonzero unless p=q) and its global extendability argument is more heuristic than the paper’s dynamical-systems proof. Overall, the paper’s argument is correct and complete, and the model’s solution is essentially correct on the main claims but would benefit from minor corrections and tighter justification. Key paper facts used: the ODE (1.1) and angle system (2.6)–(2.7), blow-up vector field (2.8), the determination of α0, and curvature computation at the origin (Proposition 2.6), and the minimal case (Theorem 1.2) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper settles a clear conjecture using a robust, well-structured dynamical-systems methodology. The technical execution appears sound, with precise local expansions and a clean curvature computation at the cusp. The global uniqueness argument is convincing and well integrated with known asymptotics. A few minor expository enhancements would improve readability, but the mathematical content is solid. The model’s parallel solution reaches the same conclusions, though with a couple of fixable technical slips.