2402.12257
Lyapunov Densities For Markov Processes: An Application To Quantum Systems With Non-Demolition Measurements
Özkan Karabacak, Horia Cornean, Rafael Wisniewski
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2 states that if a Markov operator P admits a properly subinvariant, positive function u that is locally integrable with respect to an admissible family A, then P is sweeping with respect to A. The proof in the paper proceeds by chaining known results: (i) proper subinvariance implies dissipativity via a Foguel lemma, (ii) existence of a subinvariant function yields smoothing, and (iii) dissipativity plus smoothing implies sweeping; see the definitions and statements in the paper (sweeping, admissible families, smoothing; Lemma 2; Lemma 4; Theorem 1; Theorem 2) . The candidate solution instead gives a direct potential-theoretic argument via the telescoping identity u − P^n u = ∑_{k=0}^{n−1} P^k(u−Pu), controls the localized series using the local integrability of u, and then transfers decay from g := u−Pu to arbitrary f ∈ L1 by approximation and L1-contraction. Both arguments are logically sound given the same assumptions. The approaches are different: the paper uses an abstract chain of ergodic-theory lemmas; the model uses a constructive telescoping/dominating argument.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The main theorem provides a concise, operational condition for sweeping of Markov operators via properly subinvariant functions, unifying classical ergodic-theoretic tools into a practical certificate. The exposition is generally clear and correct, and the applications are illustrative. For self-containment and ease of verification by readers outside the immediate subfield, the paper would benefit from making explicit the precise assumptions behind the smoothing and dissipative+sweeping implications and from a brief alternate direct proof sketch.