2402.14271
Hyers-Ulam stability of the first order difference equation with average growth rate
Young Woo Nam
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Hyers–Ulam (HU) stability when the geometric mean of growth rates converges to a limit ≠ 1, in both the contracting-on-average case (Theorem 2.4) and the expanding-on-average case (Theorem 3.4), and shows failure under (pre)periodic average growth even if each average value is < 1 (Lemma 4.1, Theorem 4.2). In the contracting case, the model’s Part A essentially matches Lemma 2.1 and the bound derived via Lemma 2.2, yielding the K/(K−1) constant (inequality (2.1) leading to Theorem 2.4) . However, in the expanding case, the model’s Part B incorrectly claims global injectivity and a uniform K/(K−1) bound without the additional regularity on the slowly varying factors t_n used by the paper; the paper instead obtains a robust tail estimate 2/ln K (eq. (3.8)) and explains when a K/(K−1)-type bound can be recovered (Remark 3.5) . The model’s backward-inversion argument omits needed hypotheses for existence/uniqueness of preimages and uniformity on the domain S that the paper carefully enforces via difference quotients and a contraction mapping (Lemma 3.3 and Theorem 3.4) . For the obstruction under preperiodic averages, the model’s Part C aligns with the paper’s results (Lemma 4.1, Theorem 4.2) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes HU stability under an averaged growth limit distinct from one for nonautonomous first-order difference equations, and gives a sharp obstruction for (pre)periodic averages. The arguments are correct, self-contained, and rely on standard tools (root test equivalence, contraction mapping, integral comparison). Examples are instructive and underscore the scope of the results. Minor clarifications would improve readability but are not essential.