2402.14539
Transforming Norm-based To Graph-based Spatial Representation for Spatio-Temporal Epidemiological Models
Teddy Lazebnik
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper asserts—without proof—that under the average-of-others walk L_j(t+1) = (∑_i L_i(t) − L_j(t))/(n−1) and β_{i,j}(t) = 1/|L_i − L_j|, the smallest pairwise distance converges to zero, so no fixed discretization can stay at least as fine as that distance indefinitely. This is stated correctly but omits the necessary assumption n ≥ 3 and provides no derivation; the graph-based well-mixed-node formalization is also essential to the conclusion (paper, Sec. 2.3 and 3) . The candidate solution supplies a complete, rigorous proof: centroid invariance, exact contraction of all pairwise differences by 1/(n−1), d_min(t) = (1/(n−1))^t d_min(0), the n = 2 exception, and a precise argument showing why any fixed finite graph discretization with well-mixing cannot exactly preserve β_{i,j}(t) for all initial conditions and all times.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a valuable and practical framework for translating norm-based spatial epidemiological models to graph-based representations, supported by thorough synthetic and case-based evaluations. The illustrative Sec. 3 example that motivates the limits of fixed discretization is correct in spirit, but it is presented without a formal derivation and omits the necessary condition n ≥ 3. Addressing this small gap with a short lemma and acknowledging the n = 2 edge case would resolve the main correctness concern while preserving the paper’s primary algorithmic contributions.