2402.18843
A VARIATION OF PARAMETERS FORMULA FOR NONAUTONOMOUS LINEAR IMPULSIVE DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH PIECEWISE CONSTANT ARGUMENTS OF GENERALIZED TYPE
Ricardo Torres, Manuel Pinto
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper develops the fundamental matrix W(t, τ) for the linear impulsive IDEPCAG system and derives two equivalent variation-of-parameters formulas: a “long” piecewise-integral form and a compact Green-kernel form. The candidate solution reproduces the same construction on each interval Ik (where γ(t) ≡ ζk), uses E(t, τ) = Φ(t, τ)J(t, τ) with J(t, τ) = I + ∫_τ^t Φ(τ, s)B(s) ds and the identity ∂tE = A E + B, stitches across impulses via y(tk) = (I + Ck) y(tk−) + Dk, and concatenates the factors in left-ordered time to obtain the global W(t, τ), matching the paper’s definition (4.17) and solution formula (4.16) for the homogeneous case . It then derives the full inhomogeneous variation-of-parameters representation identical to (4.24), including the additive jump contributions Σr W(t, tr)Dr, and shows the equivalence to the Green-kernel form (4.28) by partitioning [τ, t], exactly as in the paper’s (4.25)–(4.27) and (4.28) . The only difference is a minor notational convention for J(t, τ) versus J(τ, t), which the model explicitly clarifies; logically, the arguments coincide. The paper’s hypotheses (H3) ensuring the invertibility of J and hence of E are invoked in the paper and implicitly assumed by the model; this is the only (minor) omission in the model’s write-up .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper establishes a fundamental matrix and variation-of-parameters framework for linear nonautonomous IDEPCAG with impulses. The methodology—interval-wise reduction, resolvent-based intra-interval propagators, impulse jumps, left-ordered concatenation, and Green-kernel formulation—is rigorous and well-aligned with prior DEPCAG approaches. Minor clarifications around hypotheses and notation would improve accessibility, but the core results are correct and useful to specialists.