2403.01230
PROJECTIONAL ENTROPY FOR ACTIONS OF AMENABLE GROUPS
Michał Prusik
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves exactly the statement at issue: for a countable amenable group G, a normal subgroup H, and a D-strongly irreducible G-subshift X with h(X)=h(X_H), one has X = X_H^{G/H}. The proof proceeds via: (i) defining the cosetwise product lift X_H^{G/H} (independent of transversal) and noting X ⊂ X_H^{G/H} (Theorem 3.5 and Fact 3.6), (ii) establishing h(X_H^{G/H}) = h(X_H) (Theorem 3.8, using the infimum rule), (iii) showing D-strong irreducibility passes to the product lift (Theorem 3.13), and (iv) strict entropy monotonicity for strongly irreducible subshifts (Theorem 3.12), yielding the conclusion (Theorem 3.14) . The candidate solution mirrors these steps and cites the same results. The only minor imprecision is in Step 3, where the separation condition is informally expressed via D∩H inside H; the paper handles this precisely by translating patterns back to H via coset representatives before applying strong irreducibility. This does not affect correctness.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} This short paper cleanly extends the projectional-entropy equality criterion for product structure from Zd subshifts to actions of general amenable groups, under strong irreducibility. The main result is natural, the proofs are economical, and the dependence on known tools (infimum rule, lower Banach density) is appropriate. A few expository clarifications (e.g., in the lifting of strong irreducibility and in the entropy calculation via language factorization) would improve readability, but the work appears correct and of solid interest to the symbolic dynamics and amenable group actions community.