Back to search
2403.02077

A Quantitative Closing Lemma and Partner Orbits on Riemannian Manifolds with Negative Curvature

Michela Egidi, Gerhard Knieper

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves a quantitative closing lemma for geodesic flows on compact pinched negatively curved manifolds with explicit constants and shadowing, and the candidate solution proves the same result with the same constants but via a different (contact Anosov + Sasaki-metric) route. The paper’s Section 3 constructs axes of deck transformations and derives the bounds geometrically on the universal cover, yielding |T−T′| ≤ 2Cδ and d1(φs w, φs u) ≤ (5C+1)δ with C comparable to (4π/κ1)(2κ2/κ1+3) (Theorem 1 and Theorem 3.14), while the candidate solution obtains the same constants from a metric-comparison estimate and a Lipschitz bound on temporal distance for contact Anosov flows. A minor presentational mismatch is that the introduction states C = (4π/κ1)(2κ2/κ1+3) (see Theorem 1) whereas Theorem 3.14 records C = (2/κ1)(2κ2/κ1+3)·max{2π, κ1}; the candidate’s approach attains the sharper 4π/κ1 form uniformly. This is a difference in proof strategies and constants packaging rather than a correctness issue.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper provides explicit, uniform constants in a quantitative closing lemma for geodesic flows in pinched negative curvature and applies them to partner/pseudo-partner orbits. The geometric method is clean and broadly applicable. A small clarification aligning the constant C as stated in the introduction with the body Theorem 3.14 would improve clarity. Otherwise, the results appear correct and significant.