2403.04646
Constructing equilibrium states for Smale spaces
David Parmenter, Mark Pollicott
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Theorem 3.5 by (i) tilting a conditional Gibbs measure on an unstable plaque, (ii) establishing the growth rate of the normalizing integral via a plaque growth lemma (Lemma 4.1) showing lim (1/n) log ∫_{W^u} e^{S_n(G2−G1)} dμ^u_{G1} = P(G2)−P(G1), and (iii) combining an entropy estimate (Misiurewicz-type) with the variational principle to conclude that any weak* limit is an equilibrium state for G2; uniqueness for Hölder G2 then gives convergence of the entire sequence. The candidate solution follows the same construction but identifies the plaque growth rate with P(G2) using a symbolic coding argument for Smale spaces, and then derives an upper Gibbs-type inequality on global Bowen balls to reach the variational equality. Both arguments are logically sound and reach the same conclusion; the proofs differ mainly in how they prove the plaque growth rate and how they turn plaque estimates into the variational equality. The paper’s argument avoids symbolic coding and uses a direct geometric/separated–spanning set method, whereas the model leverages coding to a mixing SFT. Both are correct.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a clear and correct geometric construction of equilibrium states for Smale spaces that unifies known settings and avoids Markov partitions. The core lemma on plaque growth is of independent interest. The exposition is good, but adding clarifications on constants, the a.e. selection of plaques, and brief comparisons to coding-based perspectives would improve accessibility.