Back to search
2403.07674

The frequency problem of the three gap theorem

Huixing Zhang

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that, for Lebesgue-a.e. α, the asymptotic frequency of indices N with exactly two gap lengths is 0, i.e., lim_{n→∞}(1/n)#{1≤N≤n: #Δ_N(α)=2}=0, stated as Theorem 1 and reiterated in the conclusion (see Theorem 1 and its restatements and conclusion passages ). The proof proceeds by bounding the number of two-gap N in each interval determined by convergent denominators via Ravenstein-type structural facts (Theorem 3 and the “Scenario 1–3” counting arguments ), then using Lévy’s theorem for the exponential growth of q_n and a Borel–Bernstein/Borel–Cantelli lemma to ensure subexponential growth of partial quotients, yielding Lemma 6: (a_1+…+a_{n-1})/q_n→0 ( ). The candidate model solution proves the same main claim but via a sharper characterization (Slater) of exactly when the two-gap case occurs (N+1 equals a semiconvergent denominator), giving exact counts T(q_K−1)=∑_{j=0}^{K−1} a_{j+1}, and then the same Lévy + Borel–Cantelli metric inputs. Thus, both are correct; the paper uses upper bounds via Ravenstein’s recursion (“cake model”), whereas the model uses Slater’s exact classification. The conclusions agree while the proof techniques differ in their first step of counting.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The result is a natural and correct metric refinement of the three-gap theorem. The proof uses classical tools (Ravenstein recursion, Lévy’s theorem, and a Borel–Cantelli argument) in a coherent way. The main improvements needed concern clarity and precision in the auxiliary lemmas and notation, and situating the result relative to Slater’s exact classification.