2403.19550
SPECTRAL GAP FOR SURFACES OF INFINITE VOLUME WITH NEGATIVE CURVATURE
Zhongkai Tao
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper establishes exactly the theorem and bound stated by the model: a uniform resonance-free strip {|λ|>C0, Im λ>−β} for negatively curved even asymptotically hyperbolic (AH) surfaces and the cutoff resolvent estimate ||χ(−Δ−1/4−λ^2)−1χ|| ≤ C |λ|^{−1−C1 min(0,Im λ)} log|λ|; see the main Theorem in the introduction and its proof outline, which proceeds via Vasy’s semiclassical Fredholm reduction, a (weight-free) quantum monodromy/Grushin construction, Eberlein’s 1D trapped set structure, and Vacossin’s 2D open quantum map bounds . The reduction to a compact semiclassical family P(z) and Fredholm/radial estimates is recalled in Proposition 2.3 (and related results) . The quantum monodromy map M(z,h) controlling poles (Proposition 3.1) is constructed precisely as the model describes . The 1D description of the trapped set in 2D negative curvature (Proposition 3.4) is given using Eberlein’s theorem . Vacossin-type estimates on powers of the monodromy map (Propositions 4.1–4.2) produce the spectral gap and lead to the stated resolvent bound after rescaling λ=h^{-1}(1+z) and summing a logarithmic-length series, yielding the log|λ| factor . The only minor discrepancy is attribution of the log-loss: in the paper, the log-factor arises from iterating the monodromy map N≈c log(1/h), not directly from radial point analysis. Otherwise, the model’s solution follows the same structure and conclusions.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} This note delivers a sharp and conceptually clear extension of essential spectral gaps to negatively curved even AH surfaces, aligning modern microlocal tools (Vasy) with recent advances on open quantum maps (Vacossin) and classical hyperbolic geometry (Eberlein). The argument is clean and timely; small expository clarifications would further aid readability.