2404.07041
A note on spectral theory of integral-functional Volterra operators
Denis Sidorov
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s theorem and strategy are plausible, but the proof has gaps: (i) the contraction estimate reuses the constant q from |a(t)||α|^ε ≤ q|a(0)| to bound the sum of two operators, without actually controlling the Volterra integral part; the asserted bound “≤ q||v||_L” is not justified and even contains an α^n vs α^ε inconsistency; (ii) the operator A is claimed on C[−T,T] while K is only assumed on {s ≤ t}, which is insufficient to define ∫_0^t for t < 0. The candidate solution supplies a detailed fixed-point construction near 0 and a stepwise Volterra extension to [0,T], and it explicitly fixes the t < 0 domain issue by adding the needed assumption on K. Hence the model gives a correct and complete proof under natural hypotheses, whereas the paper’s proof is incomplete.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other \textbf{Justification:} The topic is appropriate for a short note and the main claim is plausible, but the proof is not yet publication-ready. The contraction estimate conflates two operator parts without an explicit bound on the Volterra integral’s operator norm; there is a small exponent inconsistency; and the domain assumptions for K do not guarantee the operator is well-defined on C[−T,T] as stated. These are substantial but fixable issues.