Back to search
2404.09046

Phase-Amplitude Description of Stochastic Oscillators: A Parameterization Method Approach

Alberto Pérez-Cervera, Benjamin Lindner, Peter J. Thomas

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 5.1 states precisely that if Θ and Σ are C^1 on D′, satisfy L†Θ=2π/T and L†Σ=λ_Floq Σ, and have linearly independent gradients, then there exists a unique vector field F with flow φ_t such that E[Θ(X(t))]=Θ(φ_t(x0)) and E[Σ(X(t))]=Σ(φ_t(x0)); differentiating Θ(φ_t) and Σ(φ_t) yields the constraints ∇Θ·F=2π/T and ∇Σ·F=λ_Floq Σ, and inverting the 2×2 matrix of gradients gives the explicit formula F=([∇Θ^T;∇Σ^T]^{-1}[2π/T;λ_Floq Σ]) (Theorem 5.1, Eqs. (5.5)–(5.6) ; see also the same displayed equations ). The paper justifies the mean-evolution identities via Dynkin’s formula (Eqs. (4.2)–(4.5) ). The candidate solution mirrors this line-by-line: identical pointwise linear-algebraic construction of F, the same uniqueness argument from invertibility, and the same expectation identities via Itô/Dynkin. The model adds mild regularity remarks (Peano/Picard–Lindelöf), which are consistent but not essential for the paper’s claims.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The theorem on the effective vector field is correct and tightly argued, with clear hypotheses and a direct linear-algebraic construction. The paper convincingly connects stochastic mean dynamics to a deterministic flow via MRT phase and stochastic isostable coordinates. Minor clarifications on ODE regularity (ensuring a unique flow) and domain/forward-invariance would enhance rigor without altering the main result.