2405.03621
UNIFORM BOUNDS FOR FIELDS OF DEFINITION IN PROJECTIVE SPACES
Giulio Bresciani
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves the existence of a uniform bound C_n for fields of definition of algebraic structures on P^n with finite automorphism group, via a careful stack/gerbe analysis and a case-by-case argument that reduces to finding liftable rational points on a “compression” P and uses group-theoretic bounds; in the trivial-automorphism case it recovers the classical n+1 bound by splitting a Brauer–Severi variety . The model’s proof asserts a universal PGL_{n+1}-torsor over the field of moduli and concludes that splitting a single Severi–Brauer variety always suffices (yielding C_n = n+1). That step is invalid in general: pushing the residual gerbe to B PGL produces a PGL-torsor over the residual gerbe (a finite gerbe), not over Spec(k_ξ). Consequently, the obstruction is not just a Brauer class; the paper shows that descent to P^n_k is equivalent to the existence of a k-point of the universal projective bundle over the gerbe (equivalently, a liftable point on the compression P), and handling nontrivial automorphism groups requires additional bounded extensions beyond merely splitting a Brauer–Severi variety . The paper’s argument is coherent and complete; the model’s key reduction misidentifies the locus of the torsor and overstates the bound.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes a uniform-in-n field-of-definition bound for a broad class of algebraic structures on projective space, answering a question of Doyle–Silverman and connecting the problem to the arithmetic of quotient singularities. The approach via finite gerbes, universal projective bundles, and a careful group-theoretic case analysis appears sound. While the explicit bound is not sharp and very large, the qualitative result is significant. Minor clarifications on the compression and liftability criteria would improve readability.