2405.12626
On disjoint dynamical properties and Lipschitz-free spaces
Christian Cobollo, Alfred Peris
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2.7 proves the lifting of disjoint A-transitivity from an invariant linearly dense subspace Z⊂X to the whole space X but assumes A is a filter and 0∈Z, using a construction that requires finite intersections in A . The candidate solution gives a simpler argument: intersect the given open sets with Z, apply the hypothesis on Z to obtain a disjoint return set R∈A, and note R⊂d-NT(V0,V), so by upward-heredity (the only property needed from a Furstenberg family) we get d-NT(V0,V)∈A. This works without needing the filter property or 0∈Z, and aligns with the definitions of Furstenberg families and disjoint A-transitivity in the paper . Thus both are correct; the model’s proof is strictly sharper in assumptions.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The main lifting theorem is correct but stated under stronger hypotheses than required. A short remark or streamlined proof would sharpen the result. The rest of the exposition is clear and technically sound, and the paper provides a useful framework linking disjoint A-transitivity with Lipschitz-free operators.