Back to search
2407.06997

Rank-one systems, flexible classes and Shannon orbit equivalence

Corentin Correia

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves the φ-integrable orbit equivalence for every flexible class via a carefully staged construction of S while building T, precise quantitative bounds on the cocycles cT and cS (Lemmas 5.20 and 5.21), and parameter-growth constraints (notably Lemma 5.11 and the Qn-inequalities (16)–(23)), culminating in Theorem 3.9. The candidate solution replaces these with an unproven 'three-scale carry compression' estimate |Δn| ≲ h_{n−3} and assumes the cocycle decomposes into stage-n corrections with support μ(Δn≠0) ≤ σn/hn+1; neither is established in the paper. It also relies on choosing σn=0 off a sparse subsequence and tuning ∑ h_{n−3}^p σn/hn+1<∞ without checking whether the flexible-class axioms allow such freedom at every step (particularly under Condition (C1)). These gaps undercut the claimed L^p bound and the derivation of the 1/3-threshold.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} reject

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The candidate proposes a substantially different route hinging on a stagewise cocycle decomposition with claimed bounds that are not supported by the paper or established references. It further presumes freedom in the choice of spacers that is not ensured by the flexible class axioms. By contrast, the paper's proof provides explicit, verifiable estimates and parameter constraints. Without rigorous justification of the key steps, the candidate solution is not correct.