2407.09545
Designing Chaotic Attractors: A Semi-supervised Approach
Tempei Kabayama, Yasuo Kuniyoshi, Kazuyuki Aihara, Kohei Nakajima
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper empirically demonstrates semi-supervised points ρ*—where the closed-loop LESN has MLE>0 while the output remains visually close to a periodic “skeleton”—and outlines a heuristic procedure to find them, but it does not provide a theorem or a rigorous proof of existence beyond case studies and bifurcation plots (see definitions and figures around ρ(P), ρ(E), and ρ* and the stated search protocol) . The model’s solution sketches a plausible rigorous route via center-manifold reduction and rank-one theory, but it relies on substantial, unverified hypotheses (e.g., uniform transverse contraction inherited from negative driven CLE, one-dimensional center, unimodality/nonflat criticality, and applicability of Wang–Young theory to the trained LESN family) that are neither established in the paper nor verified for the LESN setting. Consequently, the paper is incomplete as a proof, and the model is incomplete because key assumptions are not justified.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript introduces a practical and intriguing approach to generate chaos with a prescribed geometry by exploiting reservoir bifurcations. The empirical results are compelling across multiple skeletons, and the methodology is clearly explained. However, theoretical claims remain heuristic; the paper would benefit substantially from either formulating and proving a theorem under explicit assumptions or explicitly limiting its claims to empirical methodology and observations. Strengthening the link between driven CLE, closed-loop stability, and the observed bifurcation structures would improve rigor and impact.