Back to search
2407.15163

LIMIT CYCLES OF PIECEWISE SMOOTH DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS WITH NILPOTENT CENTER AND LINEAR SADDLE

Nanasaheb Phatangare, Krishnat Masalkar, Subhash Kendre

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 2.1 proves exactly the same classification as the candidate solution for the two-zone system (1.14): period annulus iff µ=0 and k≥0; for µ≠0 and δ≠0 with k<0, the number of crossing limit cycles is 0, 1, or 2 according as k>−δ^2/µ^2, k=−δ^2/µ^2, or k<−δ^2/µ^2. The paper’s proof uses the equalities F(0,y1)=F(0,y2) and H(0,y1)=H(0,y2), factorization, and elimination (equation (2.3)), which is algebraically equivalent to the model’s “line-and-circle intersection” argument on the section x=0. Thus, the proofs are the same in substance, though the model adds a geometric Poincaré-map interpretation. One minor flaw in the model is an incorrect exclusion of the y2=−y1 branch for k<0 on orientation grounds; this branch is instead excluded by H(0,y1)=H(0,y2) forcing µ=0, so it does not affect the final classification for µ≠0. Overall, both are correct and aligned with Theorem 2.1 and its proof. See Theorem 2.1 and its proof steps and examples in the PDF , and the system/first integrals definitions in (1.10)–(1.13) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The main theorem for the two-zone nilpotent-center/linear-saddle system is correct, with a clean, standard proof from first-integral equalities on the switching line and an explicit parameter classification. Some presentation details could be clarified (e.g., explicit crossing/sliding conditions, and small inconsistencies in examples), but these are minor and do not affect the results.