Back to search
2407.17079

IRREGULAR SET AND METRIC MEAN DIMENSION WITH POTENTIAL

Tianlong Zhang, Ercai Chen, Xiaoyao Zhou

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that, for systems with the specification property, the irregular set either is empty or carries full Bowen upper and lower metric mean dimension with potential, equal to the classical metric mean dimension on X (Theorem 1.1) . It does so via a Moran-like construction and a generalized pressure distribution principle at fixed scale, together with variational principles for the metric mean dimension with potential (Section 2; Proposition 3.18; concluding inequalities) . The candidate solution gives a shorter argument: (i) identify the scale-ε Carathéodory/Bowen pressure Mε with the Pesin–Pitskel construction; (ii) invoke Thompson’s full-pressure theorem for irregular sets for each fixed potential Φε = (log(1/ε))ψ; (iii) relate the pressure on X at scale ε to limsup spanning-sum growth; and (iv) divide by log(1/ε) and send ε→0. The approaches are different. The model’s logic is essentially sound but slightly overclaims in Step 2 by asserting full-pressure equality at every fixed ε directly from Thompson; Thompson yields full Pesin–Pitskel pressure (the ε→0 limit) for each fixed potential, from which the desired conclusion still follows because the scale-ε outer pressure differs from the limit by a bounded amount that vanishes after normalization by log(1/ε). With this mild correction, the model’s proof aligns with the paper’s result.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper establishes a natural and timely full-complexity result for irregular sets in the setting of metric mean dimension with potential, under specification. The proof is careful and leverages contemporary variational principles and a fixed-scale pressure distribution principle. While there are minor typographical issues and small notational inconsistencies, the core mathematical arguments are sound and clearly presented.