2408.03607
TANGENT SPACE OF THE STABLE AND UNSTABLE MANIFOLD OF ANOSOV DIFFEOMORPHISM ON 2-TORUS
Federico Bonneto, Jack Wang, Vishal Kumar
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2 states that for the Anosov perturbation S_ε on T^2 and the structural conjugacy H_ε, the limit v_ε(ψ) = lim_{t→0} V_+(ψ,t)/V_-(ψ,t) exists (with V defined from H_ε(ψ+tv_−)−H_ε(ψ)) and then develops a formal-series/derivative-tree machinery to justify and compute it; see the statement and proof roadmap around Theorem 2 and Remark 1 . The candidate solution instead gives a short geometric proof: by structural stability H_ε maps the straight stable line to the C^r (indeed analytic) stable manifold W^s_ε and the ratio V_+/V_- is the slope of secants of a C^1 graph, hence converges to the tangent slope. This relies on standard Anosov stable manifold theory (the leaves are as smooth as the diffeomorphism) and persistence/continuity of the stable bundle under small C^1 perturbations, which the paper itself recalls in Theorem 1 and Proposition 1 (iii) . The paper’s proof is more elaborate (to extract an explicit expansion); there is a minor expositional gap in the final convergence step where the authors say it “could be easily done” (following Proposition 4 and Proposition 5) without fully writing it out , but the intended estimates are standard and the overall argument is sound. Hence both are correct; the model offers a simpler, different proof.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper correctly establishes the existence of a limiting tangent direction to stable/unstable manifolds under small analytic perturbations of a linear Anosov map and introduces a detailed formal-series apparatus that yields explicit expansions. The central ideas are sound and interesting for specialists. Some analytic details (notably the final passage to the limit of the full series, claimed to be routine) should be written out to remove any ambiguity. With these clarifications, the paper would be a solid specialist contribution.