Back to search
2408.04415

The Intrinsic Reductions and the Intrinsic Depths in Non-Archimedean Dynamics

Yûsuke Okuyama

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s slope formula for the hyperbolic resultant (Theorem 2) is stated and proved correctly via the difference formula and a 0/1 directional derivative computation. The candidate model reaches the same final slope formula but its derivation contains substantive errors: (i) an incorrect coefficient in front of ρ(ξ,ξ_g) (3/2 instead of (d+1)/2), which prevents the necessary cancellation of Gauss-direction terms; (ii) a misuse of the Gromov product identity with a moving target φ(ξ) that omits a derivative term; and (iii) an unsupported “unit speed” assumption in the ‘two-rays’ lemma. Part (B) of the model (equidistribution of intrinsic depths) is essentially correct as a pushforward of the standard pullback equidistribution, but Part (A) — the core slope computation — is flawed. Hence overall: paper correct, model wrong.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper introduces and develops intrinsic reductions and intrinsic depths on the Berkovich projective line, and establishes a clean reduction-theoretic slope formula for the hyperbolic resultant that directly bridges hyperbolic geometry and reduction data. The arguments are concise and correct, and they streamline earlier approaches. The results are specialized but valuable to the non-archimedean dynamics community. Minor clarifications (pointed out below) would improve readability.