Back to search
2408.06548

THE STRONG UNSTABLE MANIFOLD AND PERIODIC SOLUTIONS IN DIFFERENTIAL DELAY EQUATIONS WITH CYCLIC MONOTONE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK

Anatoli F. Ivanov, Bernhard Lani-Wayda

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 4.2 (items a–d) is established via Lemma 3.2 (differences of points in W lie in Σ, hence pr is injective on W and W\{0} ⊂ Σ), Corollary 3.3 (global graph structure and openness of pr(W)), Lemma 3.5 (ω-limit sets on W\{0} are periodic and lie in Σ ∩ (W\W)), and a clean topological argument that pr(W) is exactly the Jordan interior of Γ = pr(O) (hence ∂W = O) . The statement of Theorem 4.2 itself matches the solver’s target precisely . The candidate (model) solution proves the same four items using the Mallet–Paret–Sell zero-count Lyapunov functional, the local strong unstable manifold (Theorem 3.1), and the Poincaré–Bendixson theory. Its structure is sound and aligns with the paper, but a few justifications are lighter: (i) it assumes pr is injective on W rather than deriving it from Lemma 3.2 + Σ ∩ (X3 ⊕ Q) = ∅ (Lemma 2.10(b)) ; (ii) the claimed “strong order-preserving” property on W with respect to the rank-2 cone K is not explicitly justified (the paper instead uses open basins and connectedness to obtain uniqueness) ; (iii) openness of pr(W) is better handled as in Corollary 3.3 using the auxiliary map h and an open-mapping argument . Despite these presentation gaps, the model’s route reaches the same conclusions and can be tightened by citing the paper’s lemmas where needed. The spectral decomposition and V-level facts used by the model also match the paper’s setup (X = Xuu ⊕ X3 ⊕ Q, V = 1 on Xuu\{0}, V = 3 on X3\{0}) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript proves a sharp, geometrically transparent description of the forward extension of the strong unstable manifold for cyclic monotone negative-feedback DDEs, identifying a unique bounding periodic orbit and the Jordan geometry of its projection. The arguments are grounded in the discrete zero-number Lyapunov framework and invariant manifold theory. The presentation is largely clear and correct; a few dense steps (notably Lemma 3.2 and the openness in Corollary 3.3) would benefit from brief clarifications.