Back to search
2408.12750

Bilateral Bounds for Norms of Solutions and Boundedness/Stability and Instability of Some Nonlinear Systems with Delays and Variable Coefficients

Mark A. Pinsky

wrongmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 1 asserts a bilateral comparison inequality (3.13) via the scalar auxiliaries (3.11)–(3.12). However, (i) the lower auxiliary (3.12) contains a +F(t) term, whereas the Dini-derivative lower bound for ||y|| yields a −||F(t)|| contribution in general; keeping a plus sign breaks the lower comparison without extra sign restrictions on F (the paper later clips z(t) at 0, but that ad hoc fix is not part of the differential problem itself) . (ii) The comparison step is justified by “solutions cannot intersect due to uniqueness,” which is not a valid comparison principle for retarded scalar equations; monotonicity in the delayed arguments is needed (the paper mentions this only as an optional remark around Lemma/Corollary) . (iii) The formal proof of Theorem 1 is essentially a pointer back to steps 3.1–3.4 and does not supply the needed first‑crossing argument or a matrix‑measure/Dini‑derivative estimate that would rigorously connect the vector norm dynamics to (3.11)–(3.12) . In contrast, the model’s solution supplies the standard logarithmic‑norm bounds and a correct scalar delay comparison (with L nondecreasing in delayed arguments, locally Lipschitz in the current value, and the necessary −||F|| in the lower comparator), from which z(t) ≤ ||V^{-1}x(t)|| ≤ Z(t) follows. The model also diagnoses the sign error and specifies the exact condition under which the paper’s printed +F can be salvaged (additional positivity structure on F in the chosen basis).

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The central bilateral comparison claim is promising and, if corrected, could be useful to practitioners analyzing norms of solutions to delayed systems. However, as written the main theorem is unsupported: the lower comparator uses an incorrect sign for the forcing in general, the comparison step relies on an invalid nonintersecting-solutions argument rather than a first-crossing method under quasi-monotonicity, and key assumptions are missing or only hinted at. Substantial revisions are necessary to restore correctness and clarify hypotheses and proofs.