2409.09443
Kitai’s Criterion for Composition Operators
Daniel Gomes, Karl-G. Grosse-Erdmann
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves (and explicitly constructs) an invertible measurable system whose composition operator on L^p is topologically mixing yet fails Kitai’s Criterion, via a careful MRC/KRC analysis and a tailored space X; this is Theorem 3.5, with the construction and verification detailed in their proof and supported by their equivalence theorems for mixing and Kitai’s Criterion . By contrast, the candidate’s simpler atomic example on Z is not mixing: by the paper’s shift criterion (Theorem 5.1), mixing of the backward shift requires that both e_{j+k} and e_{j−k} tend to 0, which fails here because the negative weights stay at 1, so ‖e_{j−k}‖ ≡ 1 . The candidate’s direct mixing proof also overlooks the persistent “left-tail” contribution T^n u, so T^n x^(n) cannot approximate v in norm.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The paper develops a natural framework that unifies and sharpens criteria for mixing and hypercyclicity of composition operators and supplies a concrete mixing-but-not-Kitai example. The results are correct and well-motivated; a few expository enhancements would improve readability but do not affect validity.