2409.11054
Averaging Theory and Catastrophes: The Persistence of Bifurcations Under Time-Varying Perturbations
Pedro C.C.R. Pereira, Mike R. Jeffrey, Douglas D. Novaes
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 states that, under K-universal (versal) hypotheses on the guiding field g_ℓ, the catastrophe surface M_Π of the stroboscopic Poincaré map equals the image of Z_{g_ℓ}×R by a strongly fibred diffeomorphism, up to the trivial branch ε=0. The proof in the paper proceeds via the displacement function of order ℓ, Δ_ℓ, using the identity Π = Id + ε^ℓ Δ_ℓ, and K-equivalence to transfer zero sets; it constructs a strongly fibred diffeomorphism whose third component is ε and shows invariance of Z_{g_ℓ}×{0} (Theorem 1 and its proof) . The candidate’s argument mirrors this exactly: (i) adopt the stroboscopic near-identity change of variables normalized at t=0 so the stroboscopic map aligns with the averaged coordinates ; (ii) define F = (Π−Id)/ε^ℓ and extend smoothly at ε=0 so F(x,μ,0)=T g_ℓ(x,μ), i.e., F=Δ_ℓ by the paper’s relation Π=Id+ε^ℓ Δ_ℓ ; (iii) invoke K-universality so F is K-induced by g_ℓ, producing Q, α, h and a strongly fibred diffeomorphism Θ=(α,h,ε) with hex=(h,ε) a local diffeomorphism, exactly as in the paper’s Lemma 2 and proof of Theorem 1 ; (iv) conclude M_Π = Φ((Z_{g_ℓ}×R)∩U) ∪ V_{ε=0} and invariance of Z_{g_ℓ}×{0} . No substantive logical gaps remain; both proofs are materially the same.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript establishes a robust and general connection between catastrophe surfaces of guiding systems and those of stroboscopic Poincaré maps under averaging. The main theorem is correct, the framework is well motivated, and the examples illuminate both persistence and stabilization phenomena. Minor expansions in the exposition would further help readers less familiar with K-equivalence and displacement functions.