Back to search
2409.19263

COUNTING PROBLEM FOR SOME RANDOM CONFORMAL ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS

Hamid Naderiyan

incompletehigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 4 correctly proves that for a.e. environment the random counting function has liminf 0 and limsup ∞ under the construction in Section 5, but its statement implicitly relies on exponential-length word counts N_n(ξ) ≍ r(A)^n. This fails for the irreducible 2×2 two-cycle A=[[0,1],[1,0]] where r(A)=1, in which case N_n(ξ)≡1 and the ratio reduces to N^ω_ξ(T)→∞ (so the liminf cannot be 0). The proof cites a deterministic inequality that presumes r(A)>1, yet the theorem’s hypotheses do not exclude r(A)=1. The candidate’s solution makes the missing hypothesis explicit and treats the r(A)=1 case separately, so it is correct and sharper.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper addresses a timely question at the interface of random dynamical systems and asymptotic counting, and it isolates a striking oscillatory phenomenon under randomization. The construction and probabilistic mechanism are convincing and in essence correct. However, Theorem 4 as stated omits a needed hypothesis (\$r(A)>1\$), implicitly used when importing a deterministic exponential counting bound, and thus fails in the irreducible two-cycle case (\$r(A)=1\$). Clarifying this and tightening some steps would make the paper solid.