2409.19263
COUNTING PROBLEM FOR SOME RANDOM CONFORMAL ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS
Hamid Naderiyan
incompletehigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 4 correctly proves that for a.e. environment the random counting function has liminf 0 and limsup ∞ under the construction in Section 5, but its statement implicitly relies on exponential-length word counts N_n(ξ) ≍ r(A)^n. This fails for the irreducible 2×2 two-cycle A=[[0,1],[1,0]] where r(A)=1, in which case N_n(ξ)≡1 and the ratio reduces to N^ω_ξ(T)→∞ (so the liminf cannot be 0). The proof cites a deterministic inequality that presumes r(A)>1, yet the theorem’s hypotheses do not exclude r(A)=1. The candidate’s solution makes the missing hypothesis explicit and treats the r(A)=1 case separately, so it is correct and sharper.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper addresses a timely question at the interface of random dynamical systems and asymptotic counting, and it isolates a striking oscillatory phenomenon under randomization. The construction and probabilistic mechanism are convincing and in essence correct. However, Theorem 4 as stated omits a needed hypothesis (\$r(A)>1\$), implicitly used when importing a deterministic exponential counting bound, and thus fails in the irreducible two-cycle case (\$r(A)=1\$). Clarifying this and tightening some steps would make the paper solid.