2410.02837
Impact of topography and combustion functions on fire front propagation in an advection-diffusion-reaction model for wildfires
Luca Nieding, Cordula Reisch, Dirk Langemann, Adrián Navas-Montilla
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper correctly identifies and mitigates spurious heating from a divergent topographic advection term and shows (numerically) that a linearized combustion law reproduces Arrhenius-like traveling fronts. However, it offers no rigorous analytical proof and defines the topflow correction via an area-averaged flux that does not imply pointwise cancellation of divergence. The model’s solution gives a clear local derivation of spurious heating and a stronger correction (w̃ = −∇·v) that would eliminate it pointwise, but this differs from the paper’s definition. Its traveling-wave derivation relies on thin-zone and completeness assumptions (Y(−∞)=0) that are not stated in the paper and contains a sign mix-up in the outer eigenvalues; the front-speed formula is not established in the paper. Hence both are incomplete: the paper is primarily phenomenological, and the model’s proof attempt needs corrected hypotheses and sign conventions.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} A solid modeling study that identifies a real issue (spurious heating from divergent topographic advection) and offers a pragmatic fix (topflow) with supportive numerics; it also documents that a linearized combustion law matches Arrhenius in practice. However, the topflow derivation and interpretation need a clearer, more rigorous treatment, and the kinetic-insensitivity claims would benefit from analytical justification or broader parameter sweeps. As it stands, the work is valuable but would be strengthened by deeper theoretical grounding and clearer assumptions.