Back to search
2410.04301

Coalescing Force of Group Pressure: Consensus in Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics

Iryna Zabarianska, Anton V. Proskurnikov

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 1 states exactly the three claims (divergent sum of p*(t) implies consensus; uniform lower bound implies exponential contraction; p*(t0)=1 implies termination) and proves them via (i) nested convex hulls, (ii) the one-step diameter contraction R(t+1) ≤ (1−p*(t))R(t), and (iii) a compactness/intersection argument; the candidate solution follows the same structure and inequalities, adding only a brief justification that diam(conv S)=diam(S). These steps and conclusions coincide with the paper’s Steps 1–3 and Theorem 1 statements.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The core result is broadly applicable and sheds light on how even vanishing conformity can ensure consensus when the public opinion remains in the current convex hull. The proof is compact and correct, relying on convex hull invariance and a tight diameter contraction inequality. Exposition is clear, though adding a couple of self-contained arguments (product–sum equivalence and the singleton-intersection claim) would improve accessibility.