Back to search
2410.09392

Finite-time stability of nonlinear conformable fractional-order delayed impulsive systems: Impulsive control and perturbation perspectives

Lingao Luo, Lulu Li, Zhong Liu, Jianmai Shi

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorems 1–2 prove finite-time stability (FTS) for conformable FO delayed impulsive systems under stabilizing (0<β<1) and destabilizing (β≥1) impulses, with settling times T1=(γ^N)^{1/Q}Γ_S0 and T2=(γ^{N0−1})^{1/Q}Γ_S0, respectively. The candidate solution reaches the same conditions and settling times via a discrete majorant construction for U=V^{1−η} and an explicit recursion across flow/impulse segments. The paper’s argument iteratively bounds V^{1−η} on each interval and uses inequalities (3.12)–(3.13) and (3.20)–(3.21); the model’s argument uses a global upper bound p(t) and concavity/subadditivity of x↦x^Q to obtain the same sufficient conditions. Both rely on the system assumptions F(0)=0 and G_j(0)=0 to ensure invariance of the origin. No logical contradictions were found; the proofs are essentially different in style but aligned in conclusions and hypotheses, matching Theorem 1 conditions (3.4)–(3.5) and Theorem 2 conditions (3.17)–(3.18) in the paper.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops finite-time stability criteria for nonlinear CFODIS under both stabilizing and destabilizing delayed impulses within the conformable fractional calculus framework. The main results are sound, extend known IO impulsive results to the CFODIS setting, and include explicit settling-time estimates. The presentation is largely clear, with illustrative examples. Minor revisions would improve completeness (e.g., filling referenced steps and uniformly stating assumptions used for invariance and delay bounds).