2410.16277
The role of edge states for early-warning of tipping points
Johannes Lohmann, Alfred B. Hansen, Alessandro Lovo, Ruth Chapman, Freddy Bouchet, Valerio Lucarini
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proposes, with simulations and heuristic arguments, that observables aligned with the edge state/instanton direction exhibit the strongest early-warning signals, and documents alignment of precritical fluctuations with that direction in multiple models, including a realistic ocean model. However, the paper explicitly states that a general theoretical underpinning and a definitive criterion are lacking. By contrast, the model’s solution provides a standard OU/linear-response derivation that variance diverges like 1/(-Re α1) and lag-Δ autocorrelation tends to e^{α1Δ} along the leading eigenvector, plus a center-manifold/instanton alignment argument in the gradient case—precisely the missing theoretical backbone. The paper’s key claims (edge/instanton alignment and directional EWS) are supported empirically but not proved, and the authors themselves call for theory. Hence: paper incomplete, model correct. See the paper’s abstract and discussion of instanton-directed fluctuations and edge-state-guided observables, as well as the explicit note that more theory is needed for a general criterion .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} Compelling numerical evidence and a clear methodological proposal: select EWS observables using the edge/instanton direction. The study spans conceptual to high-dimensional models and documents strong alignment of fluctuations with the edge direction and muted CSD for canonical but misaligned variables. However, the manuscript lacks a concise theoretical framework establishing optimality and scaling of the proposed observables; the authors themselves note that a general theoretical underpinning is missing. Adding an analytical backbone (even at the level of a short appendix with assumptions) and clarifying limitations would substantially strengthen the paper’s correctness and generality.