Back to search
2410.23122

Symplectic bipotentials

Mohammad Harakeh, Michael Ban, Géry de Saxcé

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines a symplectic bipotential b̂ with axioms ensuring pointwise nonnegativity b̂(żI,ż) ≥ ω(żI,ż) and an equality–subdifferential equivalence, then states the SBEN functional Π(z) = ∫{b̂(ż−XH, ż) − ω(ż−XH, ż)} dt has minimum value 0 over admissible paths, with the ‘natural evolution’ realizing the minimum. These are precisely the ingredients used in the candidate solution: Step 1 invokes axiom (b) to deduce Π ≥ 0; Step 2 invokes axiom (c) to characterize Π = 0 via the symplectic subdifferential conditions; Step 3 notes minimizers are exactly those paths satisfying the pointwise extremality almost everywhere. This mirrors the paper’s statement and the standard SBEN argument adapted from the Fenchel/polar setting to the bipotential setting. The paper’s core claim (Eq. (24)) and the axioms (a)–(c) are aligned with the model’s reasoning, so both are correct and essentially the same proof in different words .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript defines symplectic bipotentials with axioms sufficient to recover a nonnegativity and equality characterization for the SBEN functional, then states the variational principle and applies it to two illustrative problems. The core argument is straightforward and correct from the axioms, but the paper would benefit from a concise proof sketch and clearer statements about the admissible path space and whether a minimum is attained. With these clarifications, the contribution solidly advances the SBEN framework to nonassociated laws.