Back to search
2410.23729

Basic offspring number and robust feedback design for the biological control of vectors by sterile insect release technique

Pierre-Alexandre Bliman

incompletemedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper states the key results (extinction under the unilateral lower bound u ≥ α|Ṁ|+ + ωαM + (δs−ω)Ms with α > αcrit, and finiteness of total releases under explicit upper bounds) and sketches the proofs, but repeatedly defers full details to a forthcoming extended paper, hence it is incomplete as written . The candidate solution reaches the same conclusions via a different route (a monotone inequality on D := γ(Ms − αM) implying limsup r(t) ≤ 1/(1+γα), then a linear comparison for E,F), and its treatment of finite releases matches the paper’s bounds . However, in Step 3 the candidate’s scalar Lyapunov estimate Ẇ ≤ μE(Nr−1)W is sign-incorrect when Nr−1 < 0; a correct argument needs a weighted functional Wc = E + cF with c in (βE/δF, μE/(λ2r*)) to obtain Ẇc ≤ −κE − εF ≤ −c0Wc once r(t) ≤ r* < 1/N. With that fix, the candidate’s proof aligns with the paper’s conclusions. Therefore, both are incomplete: the paper due to omitted details, and the model due to a fixable inequality gap.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The note proposes a robust, monotonicity-based state-feedback for SIT that ensures extinction and finite total releases, with clear thresholds expressed in terms of the basic offspring number. The results appear correct and useful, but several proofs are sketched and deferred to a forthcoming extended version. For archival completeness and to aid reproducibility, full proofs (especially of Theorem 3 and the output-feedback result) should be provided within the paper or in an accompanying appendix.