2411.02190
Nekhoroshev theory and discrete averaging
V. Gelfreich, A. Vieiro
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Nekhoroshev stability for analytic, exact symplectic near‑integrable maps under strong convexity, with optimal exponents α=β=1/(2(d+1)) (Theorem 2.1) and an explicit, constructive approach via discrete averaging and an exponentially accurate embedding of near‑identity maps into autonomous Hamiltonian flows (Theorem 5.1) . The candidate solution derives the same exponents by embedding the map as a Poincaré/stroboscopic map of an analytic (d+1)‑degree‑of‑freedom Hamiltonian flow and applying the quasi‑convex Nekhoroshev theorem for flows, then sampling at integer times. This classical route is also acknowledged in the paper as the standard reduction for maps . The only minor gap in the candidate solution is a missing quantitative bound when asserting quasi‑convexity of H0(I,J)=h0(I)+J; a uniform upper bound on |ω| over the domain yields an explicit quasi‑convex constant. Aside from this routine fix, both arguments are sound and reach the same conclusion; the proofs are different in method (flow reduction vs direct discrete averaging).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript presents a clean, self-contained proof of Nekhoroshev stability for analytic, exact symplectic near-integrable maps under convexity, achieving optimal exponents and furnishing explicit constants. The discrete-averaging framework and the refined embedding theorem for near-identity symplectic maps provide a valuable alternative to normal form methods and to reductions to flows. The paper is well structured, technically careful, and places the contribution in context with both classical and recent literature. Suggested revisions are minor and concern clarifications and presentation.