Back to search
2411.06933

inf(M \ L) = 3

Harold Erazo, Davi Lima, Carlos Matheus, Carlos Gustavo Moreira, Sandoel Vieira

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves the explicit lower bound dim_H((M \ L) ∩ (3,3+ε)) ≥ W(e^{c0}|log ε|)/|log ε| − O(log|log ε|/|log ε|^2) (Theorem 1.2) via a concrete construction (local uniqueness + self-replication) and Cantor-set dimension estimates, and from this deduces inf(M\L)=3 and a liminf ≥ 1/2 proportion statement near 3. The candidate solution reproduces the same bound by combining the JEMS asymptotic for d(3+ε) with a “half-share” lower bound, effectively re-packaging the paper’s main theorem rather than reconstructing its proof. Minor issues: the candidate inverts the logical order (treating inf(M\L)=3 as an input instead of a consequence) and treats the 1/2 proportion as a premise rather than as a corollary of the explicit bound and the JEMS asymptotic. Otherwise, conclusions match the paper’s results. See the paper’s equation (1.2) and Theorem 1.2 for the key bounds and their relation to W and c0.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript establishes a precise lower bound for the Hausdorff dimension of (M \ L) near 3, leading to inf(M \ L) = 3 and a quantitative proportion result relative to the truncated dimension. The approach is technically sophisticated and well-motivated, leveraging local uniqueness, self-replication, and a probabilistic argument involving linear forms in logarithms. The exposition is solid, though a few steps could be more explicitly signposted and constants more uniformly tracked.