2411.15142
Data-driven Modeling of Granular Chains with Modern Koopman Theory
Atoosa Parsa, James Bagrow, Corey S. O’Hern, Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio, Josh Bongard
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines the deep Koopman architecture and the three MSE losses L_recon, L_lin, and L_pred (its Eq. (23)) and writes the latent relation φ(x_{t+1}) = K φ(x_t) (its Eq. (22)), then asserts (footnote 8) that the learned φ network represents Koopman eigenfunctions when K is diagonalized, but gives no proof or explicit assumptions about injectivity/invertibility of the encoder/decoder or the zero-loss regime. The candidate solution supplies a clean, correct derivation under explicit hypotheses: H1 (φ injective/decoder left-inverse), H2 (K diagonalizable), H3 (losses vanish), thereby showing φ(x_t) = K^t φ(x_0), that the coordinates in K’s eigenbasis are Koopman eigenfunctions (on the training states, and globally if the zero-loss condition holds for all initial states), and that decoded predictions are exact with zero RMSE (matching the paper’s RMSE definition, Eq. (24)).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} A well-executed applied study that brings modern Koopman operator methods to granular chains. The exposition is strong and the results are convincing. However, the key theoretical claim about learned eigenfunctions is stated informally. A brief, explicit lemma under standard assumptions (injectivity/left inverse for the encoder/decoder, diagonalizable K, and a zero-loss idealization) would complete the argument and align the presentation with the underlying operator-theoretic logic.