Back to search
2412.18950

OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF LINEAR TRANSPORT-DOMINATED SYSTEMS VIA THE SHIFTED PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION

Tobias Breiten, Shubhaditya Burela, Philipp Schulze

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s FRTO system (33a–33e) and FOTR system (34a–34e) are internally consistent and follow from the detailed Lagrangian derivation with a state-dependent mass matrix, including the nontrivial E-block terms that collect derivatives of the mass and coupling matrices with respect to the shift-coordinates and amplitudes (cf. (22)–(23), (30)–(33)) . The candidate solution incorrectly asserts that the H′[ẋ] terms cancel in the FRTO derivation and consequently identifies the E-blocks with the Jacobian of g only; however, the paper’s E-blocks explicitly contain additional contributions involving M′, N′, D′, V′, W′, and the state time-derivatives ȧs, żs (see (30)) . The candidate also omits the subtle singularity at tf for the FOTR adjoint mass matrix when asa(tf)=0 (Remark 3.2) . The paper’s noncommutation statement in Remark 3.3 is correct and aligns with the presented systems (different adjoints, terminal conditions, and control–adjoint couplings) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

Technically sound derivations of the FRTO and FOTR sPOD–G optimality systems are provided with clear identification of why the two frameworks do not commute. The work is specialized but important for reduced-order optimal control in transport-dominated settings. Minor clarifications—particularly about the structure and origin of the E-blocks and practical handling of the terminal-time singular mass in FOTR—would improve accessibility.