Back to search
2501.01419

Fredholm determinant for q-Painlevé III₃

Pavlo Gavrylenko

correcthigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines a one–circle Riemann–Hilbert problem and the Widom determinant tau τ(t) (Def. 4.1), proves the Bäcklund ratio g(t) = (s∞/s0) t^σ q^{σ−1/4} τ/τ̃ (Thm. 4.2), and derives the bilinear identity (1−t) τ(qt) τ(q−1 t) = τ(t)^2 + (qt)^{1−2σ}(s0/s∞)^2 q^{−1/2} τ̃(t)^2 together with its companion and the standard renormalized form (Thm. 4.3) . The candidate solution follows the same overall strategy: RH formulation, finite-rank variation of τ under t-shifts, Bäcklund dressing, and recovery of the nonlinear P(A(1)'₇) g-equation. Two minor inaccuracies appear: (i) the paper’s conjugated projector update is rank-1 (not “≤2”) and directly yields a scalar ratio, cf. L0^{-1} Π+ L0 = Π+ + u ⊗ ū and τ(qt)/τ(t) = 1 + … ; and (ii) the renormalization prefactor for T_ren is s0/s∞ (not its inverse) in order to obtain the symmetric √t-Hirota pair . With these adjustments, the candidate’s proof aligns with the paper’s argument and conclusions.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript establishes a clean RH/Widom determinant framework for q-Painlevé A(1)'7, deriving both the bilinear (Hirota) identities and the Bäcklund ratio linking the transcendent g to tau functions, and further providing explicit kernels and combinatorial expansions. The argument is systematic, technically transparent, and bridges analytic and combinatorial viewpoints. Minor improvements to normalization tracking and early emphasis on the rank-1 update would enhance readability.