2501.02485
Semi-analytic construction of global transfers between quasi-periodic orbits in the spatial R3BP
Amadeu Delshams, Marian Gidea, Pablo Roldan
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 is proved via a robust IFS argument that breaks all essential f-invariant circles using a scattering map with action oscillation exceeding ρ2>ρ1, and then applies a standard shadowing lemma to obtain a true orbit from U1 to U2; the key steps are stated precisely and referenced (Theorem 1 hypotheses and conclusion; Theorem 2 for the IFS crossing; Theorem 3 for shadowing) . By contrast, the model’s proof hinges on unproved “angle steering” at each inner iterate: it assumes one can choose n so that the inner map places the angle in a prescribed open set V_I on every step, ensuring ΔI≥ρ2−ε. That reachability is not implied by (I.i)–(I.ii); invoking shadowing does not fix this scheduling gap. Hence the model’s proof is incomplete under the stated hypotheses, while the paper’s argument is sound.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} reject \textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid \textbf{Justification:} The paper’s main theorem (inner+scattering IFS implies diffusion) is established cleanly via breaking essential invariant circles and a shadowing lemma, with assumptions checked quantitatively in the application. The model’s proposed alternative proof relies on choosing inner iterate lengths to steer angles into specific open sets at every step, a property not guaranteed by the stated twist/drift hypotheses; shadowing cannot substitute for this missing reachability. Thus, the model’s proof is incomplete, whereas the paper’s approach stands on standard, validated tools.