Back to search
2501.11032

A formula of local Maslov index and applications

Li Wu, Chaofeng Zhu

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 1.2 states exactly the Maslov–Morse endpoint formula and the dimension identity the model proves, namely Mas±{λ,μ} = ±dim(λ(0)∩μ(0)∩Y(0)) ∓ dim(λ(1)∩μ(1)∩Y(1)) ± m±(Q(1)) ∓ m±(Q(0)) and dim(λ∩μ) = dim ker Q + dim(A∩B) (). The authors’ proof proceeds via a triangular decomposition and a fixed-vertical reduction (Proposition 5.8), yielding Mas± = ±m±(Q(1)) ∓ m±(Q(0)) and the pointwise dimension identity (), then adds the vertical pair (γ,δ) contribution and telescopes endpoint terms (). Locally, Theorem 1.1 gives that the Maslov jump equals the variation of the Morse indices and dim(λ∩μ)=m0(Q) (). The model supplies a different but compatible route: naturality to a fixed model, graph/linear-relation representation, a short exact sequence yielding dim(λ∩μ) = dim ker Q + dim(A∩B), and a crossing-form/Morse-variation argument on intervals where A,B are fixed. These steps align with identities in the paper (e.g., the identification of Q with ω(x,(λ−μ)x) and the dimension formula (58)) ().

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript establishes a precise and practically usable formula for the Maslov index of paths of pairs of Lagrangian subspaces, expressed as an endpoint-corrected variation of the Morse indices of an associated quadratic form. The path-wise triangular decomposition and the fixed-vertical reduction streamline computations and tie together finite- and infinite-dimensional viewpoints. The arguments are technically careful; modest clarifications (especially around reductions and notation) would further enhance accessibility.