2501.16041
Output-Feedback Control of the Semilinear Heat Equation via the L2 Residue Separation and Harmonic Inequality
Anton Selivanov, Emilia Fridman
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s main theorem (stabilization via the L2 residue separation with the harmonic inequality and two Riccati equations) is internally consistent and its proof steps check out, including the precise treatment of the residue via ζ, the optimal choice of γ from a harmonic series, and the cancellation of interconnection terms u and ζ between the low-mode and residue estimates. By contrast, the candidate solution contains a critical error in its Lyapunov functional: it weights the infinite-dimensional residue by v_n = 1/(λ_n − q − σ), then claims a norm equivalence V ≳ ∥z∥^2; this is false because v_n decreases to 0 as n→∞, so (1/γ)∑ v_n z_n^2 does not control ∑ z_n^2. The candidate also tacitly assumes ∑ v_n f_n^2 ≤ ∑ f_n^2 (i.e., 1/(λ_N − q − σ) ≤ 1) without justification. Hence the model’s final L2-stability conclusion is not supported by its chosen Lyapunov functional, whereas the paper avoids this pitfall by using V∞ = γ^{-1}∑_{n≥N} z_n^2 and the harmonic inequality to close the estimates.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions \textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field \textbf{Justification:} The manuscript offers a constructive, quantitatively sharp framework for spillover-free output-feedback control of a semilinear heat equation. Its originality lies in the harmonic inequality that tightens the L2 residue gain, materially reducing controller order relative to Sobolev-based bounds, and in a clean synthesis with two Riccati equations ensuring separation and cancellation across subsystems. The arguments are technically sound and well-motivated; the exposition could be further streamlined with additional signposts and reminders of standard tools.